White House cannot name a mass shooting that would have been prevented by gun control


WINTERY KNIGHT

Guns are for self-defense against criminals Guns are for self-defense against criminals

This is from the Washington Free Beacon.

Excerpt:

White House spokesman Josh Earnest struggled to answer direct questions Thursday about whether any of President Obama’s proposed gun control measure would have prevented the recent mass shootings seen in the U.S.

Reporter Byron Tau brought up Sen. Marco Rubio’s (R., Fla.) remark that no recent mass shootings would have been prevented by gun legislation, a statement rated “True” by the Washington Post fact-checker.

[…]“Can the White House point to a recent mass shooting that would have been stopped by a expanded assault weapons ban or stricter background checks?” Tau asked. “The evidence seems to be that in all these recent mass shootings, these folks either passed background checks or were very determined to circumvent the strict gun laws that are already on the books. Can you point to any that would have been prevented…

View original post 679 more words

Advertisements

One Response to White House cannot name a mass shooting that would have been prevented by gun control

  1. Bullright says:

    Nope, but they did stay at a Holiday Inn once.

%d bloggers like this: