Four more years? – Tea Party Nation

 

Four more years? – Tea Party Nation.

Posted by Judson Phillips

This November, America will make a decision.  It will either throw Obama out of office and give us a man who hopefully will lead this nation away from the fiscal cliff or we will have four more years of a President who wants to destroy his own country.

 What will happen if Obama gets four more years?

 Stanley Kurtz has some ideas.  Obama’s next four years really would be a socialist nightmare.

 From Forbes:

 President Obama’s plans for a second-term include an initiative to systematically redistribute the wealth of America’s suburbs to the cities.  It’s a transformative idea, and deserves to be fully aired before the election.  But like a lot of his major progressive policy innovations, Obama has advanced this one stealthily–mostly through rule-making, appointment, and vague directives.  Obama has worked on this project in collaboration with Mike Kruglik, one of his original community organizing mentors.  Kruglik’s new group, Building One America, advocates “regional tax-base sharing,” a practice by which suburban tax money is directly redistributed to nearby cities and less-well-off “inner-ring” suburbs.  Kruglik’s group also favors a raft of policies designed to coerce people out of their cars and force suburbanites (with their tax money) back into densely packed cities.

Obama has lent the full weight of his White House to Kruglik’s efforts.  A federal program called the Sustainable Communities Initiative, for example, has salted planning commissions across the country with “regional equity” and “smart growth” as goals.  These are, of course, code words.  “Regional equity” means that, by their mere existence, suburbs cheat the people who live in cities.  It means, “Let’s spread the suburbs’ wealth around” – i.e., take from the suburbanites to give to the urban poor. “Smart growth” means, “Quit building sub-divisions and malls, and move back to where mass transit can shuttle you between your 800 square foot apartment in an urban tower and your downtown job.” In all likelihood, these planning commissions will issue “recommendations” which Obama would quickly turn into requirements for further federal aid.  In fact, his administration has already used these tactics to impose federal education requirements on reluctant states.  Indeed, part of Obama’s assault on the suburbs is his effort to undercut the autonomy of suburban school districts.

 There is a reason why people are fleeing the cities and going to suburbs.  Because the management of big cities sucks!  There is no other way to describe it.

 In some ways, we are already seeing the subsidization of cities by the suburbs.  The Federal Government collects tax dollars and then doles out large grants to cities.  The dark secret is that if it were not for the federal subsidizes to big cities, they would go under.  Even with ongoing federal bailouts, cities run by liberal politicians are going under.  Which California city is going to declare bankruptcy this week?

What about Detroit?   Even federal bailouts cannot save that city.

 Liberalism has failed America.  It is time we let some of these cities fail and hold the liberal politicians accountable for what they have done.

 

The Devil’s bargain

The Devil’s bargain

USA Today had an editorial about the Aurora shooting, where it referred to the Second Amendment as the “devil’s bargain.”

 There is a devil’s bargain, but it has nothing to do with the Second Amendment.  What is it?

  

The devil’s bargain is listening to liberals and allowing them to make any decisions for our government.  Let’s put it in terms the left understands.  “Liberals lied, people died.”

 

Liberals have a set formula they work every time and we let them get away with it every time.

  

The formula is the left picks a target, something that works that they do not like.  They start causing as many problems as they can to keep the system from working right, then declare the system broken and the only solution is their bad idea.

  

In 1996, Congress passed the Anti Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act.  The idea was to make the death penalty more effective and faster.  The federal government decided it would throw billions of dollars into training so that death penalty convictions would not be set aside due to ineffective lawyers and convicted criminals would not spend 20 years on death row before execution.

  

All the law did was gum up the works even more.  Now, sixteen years later, dozens of convictions and death sentences are thrown out every year because of “ineffective assistance of counsel.”  Defendants now spend even longer on death row.  With the possible exception of Texas, condemned criminals are more likely to die of old age and natural causes than have a date with the executioner’s needle.

  

Now, the same liberals who have totally screwed up the criminal justice system are announcing it is irrevocably broken and the only solution is what they wanted from the beginning, namely the abolition of the death penalty.

 

In an editorial today, the brain donors on the editorial staff of USA Today called the Second Amendment a “devil’s bargain.”  They wailed, “It’s a devil’s bargain that allows millions of law-abiding people to own and use guns responsibly, while accepting thousands of deliberate and accidental shootings a year, including the sort of perverse tragedy that occurred in Colorado.”

 No, the devil’s bargain is listening to liberals, like the editorial staff of USA Today.

 

None of the mainstream media pointed out some salient facts.  Aurora Colorado has strict gun control laws.  The movie theater told its patrons that it was a gun free zone.

 The simple truth is, because liberals had successfully barred guns from that movie theater, the shooter had a target rich environment with no real threats.

 

Had there been one or two armed citizens in the audience, the story would have been different.

 

Liberals have been desperate to disprove the obvious.  The obvious is that had people in the movie theater been able to shoot back, the death toll would not have been so high.

 

The liberal media reached out to some liberal big city police chiefs who parroted the party line back that armed citizens would not have helped.

 

When you get away from the guys who spent their careers in air-conditioned offices, schmoozing their way to the top and talk to the cops who are on the street, another story emerges.

 

I interviewed several current or former police officers for a blog and they all said the same thing.  One or more armed citizens would have made a difference.  Would they have killed the shooter?  Probably not, though that would have been a possible outcome.  At the least, since he was not a trained shooter, it would have been a distraction.  Could they have wounded him or pinned him down and allowed more people to escape?  That is an almost certainty.

 

Liberalism is a fact free zone.  John Adams said facts are hard things and liberals never like to be confused with facts.  Liberals believe things always are as they should be, never as they actually are.

 

Gun control has been tried.  It has failed.  Look at major American cities with restrictive gun control laws.  They are free fire zones for criminals.   Look at both Australia and the UK where gun ownership has been banned.  Violent crime is through the roof because criminals know victims are defenseless.

 

Look at two nations where just the opposite is true, Switzerland and Israel.  In both nations, most adults have military issued firearms.   They do not have mass shootings.  Israel has terrorist attacks but the preferred method of terrorist attack is the homicide bomber, not the shooter.

 

The one constant all of these mass shooting have is they took place in venues where the shooter knew the victims would be unarmed.

 

Thomas Jefferson said it best in 1764, when he said, “”Laws that forbid the carrying of arms . . . disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes . . . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man.”

  

The answer is not gun control.  We get those calls every time we have one of these incidents. 

 

The answer is an armed, trained and self-reliant citizenry.

 

Editorial Note:  I refuse to identify the Aurora shooter by name.  He should not be glorified or even get his 15 minutes of fame.  It is the victims of the Aurora shooting that should be remembered, not this criminal.

Liberalism as mental illness – Tea Party Nation

English: The carbon footprint.

Liberalism as mental illness – Tea Party Nation.

Posted by Judson Phillips

We know liberals are nuts.  In fact calling them just plain crazy is an understatement.  Every now and then a liberal comes out with something so crazy and stupid that you just have to sit there and shake your head in amazement.

 There is one liberal who may have made it into the liberal mental illness hall of fame.  Who is it and what did they do?

 There is a liberal named Daphne Tremayne and she runs a website called Greentremayne.com.    Surely she is an Al Gore devote or maybe she has just learned from his carbon credits scam because guess what she is selling? 

 But she wants to tell us all how to live. 

 Her first suggestion:  do not have children.

 That is probably really good advice for her as we definitely have too many stupid people in the world today.   But she takes it further.  She says:

 If You Must Have Children, Buy Baby Credits

      Baby Credits are similar to regular Carbon Credits, however, instead of being backed by non-productive parcels of land, Baby Credits are backed by non-productive women of child-bearing age.  We at GreenTremayne have contracted to purchase Fair Trade Baby Credits from tuberculosis sanatoriums in Africa, where quarantining has resulted in the segregation of male and female patients.  With every Baby Credit you purchase, you can have the peace of mind knowing that your money goes to support non-productive women in the developing world.  And because poverty is rampant in Africa, Baby Credits can be purchased at bargain prices.  Baby Credits make great shower gifts.  See our products page for more information about ordering Baby Credits!

 What a scam!  This is certainly the validation of PT Barnum’s truism that there is a sucker born every minute and a fool and his money are soon parted.  Al Gore has made a fortune scamming people on this carbon credit nonsense.  This is much like the Middle Ages scam of selling indulgences. 

 But for Daphne Tremayne, the scamming goes straight into crazy with this next advice.

 Euthanize Your Old Pet

      Pets have become a common feature in most homes and are an attribute of the modern, Western lifestyle.  We all love our dogs and cats, but really, when you think about it, pets are a major producer of excess carbon.  One of the best ways to reasonably enjoy your pet and reduce your overall Carbon Footprint is to determine in advance how long your pet should live.  As a family, set a date when your pet will be euthanized.  One great way to teach children the value of pet euthanasia is to turn the occasion into a family celebration.  Let’s say you’ve set March 10, five years from now, as your pet’s euthanasia date.   For the next five years, celebrate March 10 as your pet’s special day, with a family party and perhaps a visit to your pet’s future burial spot.  Teach your children to think of the occasion as a birthday in reverse.  A predetermined euthanasia date will encourage your family to love and care for your furry friend while it’s still young and playful.  What’s more, pre-planing for pet termination not only works towards reducing your family’s Carbon Footprint, but guarantees long term reduction in veterinary expenses.

 Is she insane?

 Yes, I want to traumatize my kids by letting them know two years from now we are going to murder their beloved pet.  That makes so much sense.  Yes, Daphne, please do not breed.  You are too stupid to be a parent.  In fact, you probably should not make any decision any more important than deciding whether you should flush the toilet, though I doubt she does that by worrying she’ll use too much water. 

 The scary thought with the liberal nut jobs is where things go if you take their insane ideas to their logical conclusion.

 Old people create a larger “carbon footprint.”  Liberals love to get rid of old people.    Look at Obamacare.  If you are a senior citizen, you can forget about life saving medical care.  All you get is comfort care under socialist healthcare.   Not only does socialist healthcare cause suffering and death, it allows socialists to reduce our carbon footprint.

 It doesn’t take a brain surgeon to conclude that eventually, these nutjobs will use the same argument for scheduling senior citizens to be euthanized at a certain age.  But don’t get too upset, because every year for the rest of your pre-determined life, they’ll throw you a party to remind you that in just a few short years, they’ll terminate your time on this planet.

 I have a suggestion for all of these liberals who are so obsessed with reducing carbon footprints.  Let’s start with them.

 For people like Daphne Tremayne, if you are serious about reducing your carbon footprint, why don’t you move to a village in the Amazon River area?  You can be childless and petless there.  You can live without electricity or any of the modern conveniences that you think cause all of the world’s problems.

 Of course, liberals like Daphne Tremayne are not going to do that.   They will not give up their designer clothes or their nice homes or their computers, TV’s, Iphones, IPads and other modern toys.

 They simply want everyone else to suffer.  Liberals love to claim how fair they are.  Yet everywhere liberals are, they want to do the same thing.  They want others to suffer while they are the elite class. 

 Liberals are not only nuts they are hypocrites.  If you doubt, just look at them, what they say and more importantly what they believe. 

 Then be very afraid.

Conservatism 101 For Those Not Paying Attention. – Tea Party Nation

Conservatism 101 For Those Not Paying Attention. – Tea Party Nation.

Posted by Lloyd Marcus

You and I are politically well informed. But there are many Americans like my family who do not follow politics as closely as we do. Their political views are shaped by liberal media bias hit pieces, spin and sound bites.

99.9 % of my family are democrats because Marcus family traditional taught us the democrats are “for the little guy”. Republicans are “rich white racists”. Liberal media and the Democratic Party jointly support and promote this silly simple lie which still wins the democrats 95% of the black vote.

Despite me, the eldest of his five children being a black conservative tea party Republican, my 84 year old dad’s negative view of Republicans remains steadfast. Dad tolerates my baffling political views because he loves me.

However, I would not be surprised if my family scheduled an intervention. A black van pulls up, a hood is thrown over my head and I’m carted off to an undisclosed location. I am denied food, water, bathroom privileges and subjected to video of Obama speeches 24/7 until I break.

It occurred to me that my family like many Americans are probably clueless regarding the truth of what it means to be a liberal and a conservative. Ironically, the majority of my family lives extremely responsible “conservative” lives. They go to work every day, serve their communities, attend church and raise their kids. And yet, the liberal media has lead them to believe the term “conservative” equals evil white racist.

So, I would like to offer my family and others a little “Conservatism 101”. For fun, let’s call it “Conservatism for Dummies”.

Let us begin with a parable.

Tale of Two Dads- School is Difficult and Little Johnny Wishes to Stay Home.

Little Johnny says, “Dad I don’t want to go to school. The kids are mean and the work is too hard!”

Liberal Dad replies, “I know just how you feel son. School was no picnic for me either. Stay home today”.

Conservative Dad replies, “Boy, you had better get your butt out of that bed and get ready for school. I’ll talk to the principal and your teachers to work out any problems. An education is vital to your future success and happiness. I’m forcing you to go to school because I love you!”

I am not suggesting Liberal Dad does not love his child. But Liberal Dad’s attempt to be his child’s friend rather than a responsible parent is a spineless choice all about making himself feel good.

Patently liberal. Most liberal thinking and choices are about making themselves feel good as opposed to truly helping the people they claim to feel great compassion towards.

Conservative Dad’s reply was that, not of a friend, but a responsible loving parent.

Liberalism is a religion. Despite failing whenever implemented, disciples of Liberalism faithfully believe if they can spend a little more of “other people’s money”, they can bring forth their godless utopia where man is the ultimate authority. Atheists tend to embrace Liberalism.

Conservatism equals true/real compassion; rooted in common sense and honoring the human spirit. Conservatism celebrates achievement and a desire to be all one can be.

Liberalism is harmful and idiotic, while shrouded in so-called compassion. For example. Teachers at an LA school wanted Ebonics to be acceptable speech for black students. They argued that speaking Ebonics was cultural and learning English was too difficult. Black kids are not too stupid to learn to speak English correctly. Also, an inability to speak English is economically stifling.

And yet, whenever compassionate conservatives suggest learning English be required, they are branded racist by liberals.

You would think a “Liberal” is someone who is easy going, embracing a live-and-let-live attitude. In reality, liberals tend to be HUGE control freaks; arrogantly thinking themselves compassionately and intellectually superior to us common folks. This makes them best qualified to dictate how we should live our lives. Liberalism birthed Political Correctness which seeks to control what we are permitted to think, say and do.

Unquestionably, America was founded on Godly principles. Liberals want all reference to God banned from government and the public square, while demanding we display great tolerance for every other religion. Am I saying liberals tend to be anti-Christian? Yes!

Liberals are notorious for setting rules for the rest of us while exempting themselves. They want the government to demand we drive little more than lawnmowers covered with an auto body to “save the planet”. Meanwhile, they travel in limos and private jets.

In a nutshell, Liberals believe they know best. They use government to constantly invade our lives with new restrictions and controls. Government control hidden in Obamacare is the epitome of Liberalism.

I hope I have educated my family and others a little to the virtues of Conservatism and why it is best for all people.

Lloyd Marcus, Proud Unhyphenated American

Chairman of The Campaign to Defeat Barack Obama.
Lloyd is singer/songwriter of the American Tea Party Anthem
and author of Confessions of a Black Conservative, foreword by Michele Malkin.
Spokesperson for Tea Party Express
Please help me spread my message by joining my Liberty Network.
LloydMarcus.com

7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understanding The World – John Hawkins – Townhall Conservative

7 Reasons Why Liberals Are Incapable of Understanding The World – John Hawkins – Townhall Conservative.

To understand the workings of American politics, you have to understand this fundamental law: Conservatives think liberals are stupid. Liberals think conservatives are evil.Charles Krauthammer

Even liberals who’ve accomplished a lot in their lives and have high IQs often say things on a regular basis that are stunningly, profoundly stupid and at odds with the way the world works. Modern liberalism has become so bereft of common sense and instinctually suicidal that America can only survive over the long haul by thwarting the liberal agenda. In fact, liberalism has become such a toxic and poisonous philosophy that most liberals wouldn’t behave differently if their goal were to deliberately destroy the country. So, how does liberalism cause well-meaning, intelligent liberals to get this way? Well, it starts with…

1) Liberalism creates a feedback loop. It is usually impossible for a non-liberal to change a liberal’s mind about political issues because liberalism works like so: only liberals are credible sources of information. How do you know someone’s liberal? He espouses liberal doctrine. So, no matter how plausible what you say may be, it will be ignored if you’re not a liberal and if you are a liberal, of course, you probably agree with liberal views. This sort of close-mindedness makes liberals nearly impervious to any information that might undermine their beliefs.

2) Liberals sources of information are ever present. Conservatives are regularly exposed to the liberal viewpoint whether they want to be or not. That’s not necessarily so for liberals. Imagine the average day for liberals. They get up and read their local newspaper. It has a liberal viewpoint. They take their kids to school, where the teachers are liberal. Then they go to work, listen to NPR which has a liberal viewpoint on the way home, and then turn on the nightly news which also skews leftward. From there, they turn on TV and watch shows created by liberals that lean to the left, if they have any political viewpoint at all. Unless liberals actively seek out conservative viewpoints, which is unlikely, the only conservative arguments they’re probably going to hear are going to be through the heavily distorted, poorly translated, deeply skeptical lens of other liberals.

3) Liberals emphasize feeling superior, not superior results. Liberalism is all about appearances, not outcomes. What matters to liberals is how a program makes them FEEL about themselves, not whether it works or not. Thus a program like Headstart, which sounds good because it’s designed to help children read, makes liberals feel good about themselves, even though the program doesn’t work and wastes billions. A ban on DDT makes liberals feel good about themselves because they’re “protecting the environment” even though millions of people have died as a result. For liberals, it’s not what a program does in the real world; it’s about whether they feel better about themselves for supporting it.

4) Liberals are big believers in moral relativism. This spins them round and round because if the only thing that’s wrong is saying that there’s an absolute moral code, then you lose your ability to tell cause from effect, good from bad, and right from wrong. Taking being non-judgmental to the level that liberals do leaves them paralyzed, pondering “why they hate us” because they feel incapable of saying, “That’s wrong,” and doing something about it. If you’re against firm standards and condemning immoral behavior, then your moral compass won’t work and you’ll also be for immorality, as well as societal and cultural decay by default.

5) Liberals tend to view people as parts of groups, not individuals. One of the prejudices of liberalism is that they see everyone as part of a group, not as an individual. This can lead to rather bizarre disparities when say, a man from a group that they consider to be powerless, impoverished victims becomes the leader of the free world — and he’s challenged by a group of lower middle class white people who’ve banded together because individually they’re powerless. If you listen to the liberal rhetoric, you might think Barack Obama was a black Republican being surrounded by a KKK lynching party 100 years ago — as opposed to the single most powerful man in America abusing the authority of his office to attack ordinary Tea Partiers who have the audacity to speak the truth to power for the good of their country.

6) Liberals take a dim view of personal responsibility. Who’s at fault if a criminal commits a crime? The criminal or society? If someone creates a business and becomes a millionaire, is that the result of hard work and talent or luck? If you’re dirt poor, starving, and haven’t worked in 5 years, is that a personal failing or a failure of the state? Conservatives would tend to say the former in each case, while liberals would tend to say the latter. But when you disconnect what an individual does from the results that happen in his life, it’s very difficult to understand cause and effect in people’s lives.

7) Liberals give themselves far too much credit just for being liberal. To many liberals, all one needs to do to be wise, intelligent, compassionate, open minded, and sensitive is to BE LIBERAL. In other words, many of the good things about a person spring not from his actions, but from the ideology he holds. This has an obvious appeal. You can be a diehard misogynist, but plausibly call yourself a feminist, hate blacks, but accuse others of racism, have a subpar IQ and be an intellectual, give nothing to charity and be compassionate, etc., etc., and all you have to do is call yourself a liberal. It’s a shortcut to virtue much like the corrupt old idea of religious indulgences. Why live a life of virtue when you could live a sinful life and buy your way into heaven? If you’re a liberal, why actually live a life of virtue when you can merely call yourself a liberal and get credit for being virtuous, even when you’ve done nothing to earn it?

Liberals and the First Amendment – Tea Party Nation

Liberals and the First Amendment – Tea Party Nation.

Posted by Judson Phillips on August 8, 2011 at 3:59pm in Tea Party Nation Forum

There is a myth that liberals love the First Amendment.   There is a myth that liberals love freedom and are tolerant of other people’s beliefs. 

 That is the thing about myths.  They make great stories but usually are a polar opposite from the truth.

 What is the truth?

 The truth is liberals are absolutely intolerant of any person or belief who does not worship at the altar of liberalism.

 In Wisconsin, Democrats are going after a journalist.  Wait! Say it isn’t so!  Liberals are going after someone protected by the First Amendment.

 In the liberal mind, the First Amendment exists to protect liberal speech.  In Wisconsin, a Democratic hack named Graeme Zielinski attacked a Wisconsin media outlet, telling them that unless they confessed their sins, namely admitting they had a bias, he would send the union thugs and other extreme left wing activists after the Wisconsin Reporter. 

 The dispute began over the issue of whether an interview the Wisconsin Reporter had published was on the record or off the record.  Rules for journalists are pretty simple.  If a comment is made on the record it is fair game.  If it is off the record it does not get quoted. 

 Sometimes there can be confusion and anyone who deals with the media on a regular basis knows the first question you ask when you are dealing with the media is, “are we on the record or off the record.” 

 There is a dispute about whether an interview was on the record or off.  That is just a fight that is not even an ideological battle.  But that is not good enough for the liberal establishment. 

 The left claims that the Wisconsin Reporter is “biased” and part of their demands are an apology where they admit the “obvious bias” of their operation. 

 The Wisconsin Democrats and their extreme left wing allies care nothing about freedom of the press and certainly have no objection when a media outlet has a liberal biasMSNBC anyone?

 Of course the left does not really like pesky things like freedoms or for that matter they don’t really even like elections. 

 During the Restoring Common Sense tour, we have seen liberal tolerance at work.  First, the extreme left wing activists came to our first event and tried to shout us down, then they tried to interfere with our speakers and our sound system.

 In dealing with the left, everyone must understand, they never want a free press.  They want a press that slavishly follows their lead; never criticizing the left and firing off blistering criticism for everything a conservative does, including getting up in the morning. 

 This is why the left hates Fox News so much.  Fox News is not conservative; they are simply fair and balanced.  Most of the mainstream media talk show programs consist of a liberal host and three liberal guests against one conservative.   For conservatives, being outnumbered four to one is a fair fight. 

 If a Republican threatened a liberal news outlet the way this Democratic hack did, it would be headline news.  The liberal media would be all over it.

Instead, because it is a liberal Democrat doing the attacking, all we hear is the sound of crickets. 

Obama’s Freefall in the Polls -19% and Dropping…..can you hear us now? (via Voting American)

Obama's Freefall in the Polls -19% and Dropping.....can you hear us now? Dear President Obama, “Now is the time for all American’s to rise up and speak with a loud voice.  2012 will be upon us before we know it and there is no time to waste.  This is the time to tell your family and friends to get involved.  This is the time to get them informed and this is the time to get them involved.  America hangs in the balance my friends.  Our very … Read More

via Voting American

The liberal mob – Tea Party Nation

Author & media personality Ann Coulter (right).

Image via Wikipedia

The liberal mob – Tea Party Nation.

A mob is a terrible thing to behold.  They are a sea of angry humanity, ruled by passion and unrestrained emotion.  They are devoid of logic, reason or even intelligent thought.  Mobs are reduced to the base emotion, incapable to expression them selves in anything more than the simplest of statements, which usually involved the idea of killing something or someone.

This is liberalism at its finest. 

I get a first hand taste of the liberal mob on a regular basis.  I willingly appear on MSNBC on a semi regular basis.   I don’t mind.  I believe we need to take our message into enemy territory. 

Unfortunately, if anyone believes we can rationally discuss things with liberals, they are sadly mistaken. 

Some of the comments from the left from yesterday’s appearance on the Ed show are a pretty good example of how you cannot discuss anything with liberals.

@bigtexanstan sent this piece of wisdom to my @teapartynation twitter feed:

Judson Phillips you are a liar, corporate skank, and toilet paper for your corporate benefactors and Wall Street pirates.

 @storyfor60min added this piece of wisdom:

News flash, most tbaggers are completely ignorant about government. Actually, they’re stupid.

Pat Babington (patbabington@depauw.edu) sent an email.   

Just saw your performance.  Do you really believe the things you say?  I’m surprised that you are allowed to lie like you do. You must be delusional.

Telling the truth to a liberal is a lie.   You would expect more from a professor at DePauw University.  Perhaps the alumni should tell the school administration, as long as they have clowns like him as professors, contributions will be cut off.

Another liberal from Kentucky (18594623273) sent me this lovely voice mail.  (Language warning)

voice-message-7.wav

This is typical of liberals.  This is why we conservatives must win the war of ideas and politics.  There is no compromise with people who despise you.  There is no compromise with those who only wish to silence a point of view that disagrees with them. 

Ann Coulter wrote a book a few years ago called, “How to argue with a liberal (if you must).”  Forget arguing with them.  That is simply a waste of time. 

I have a better idea.  Let’s simply beat them in the battle of ideas and crush liberalism.  Let’s put liberalism on the ash heap of history, where it belongs.