Cato Study Shows Private Gun Ownership Reduces Crime, Saves Lives – Daniel J. Mitchell – Townhall Finance


Cato Study Shows Private Gun Ownership Reduces Crime, Saves Lives – Daniel J. Mitchell – Townhall Finance.

I’ve mentioned before how I’m proud and lucky to work for the Cato Institute, first and foremost because my colleagues are scrupulously non-partisan. We promote the ideals of freedom and liberty and we’ll work with any politician of any party who happens to be on the right side. Likewise, we’ll attack statism, regardless of what political party is in charge.

But I’m also proud to be at Cato because of the high-quality research. The latest example is a study looking at examples of defensive gun use. It’s a fascinating look at real-world anecdotes, augmented by references to other scholarly work.

If you’ve seen the Powerpoint presentation on the Second Amendment that I posted, you’ll understand why I like this new research. Here are some key excerpts.

If policymakers are truly interested in harm reduction, they should pause to consider how many crimes—murders, rapes, assaults, robberies—are thwarted each year by ordinary persons with guns. …This paper uses a collection of news reports of self-defense with guns over an eight-year period to survey the circumstances and outcomes of defensive gun uses in America. …the study by Gary Kleck and Marc Gertz…found that there were somewhere between 830,000 and 2.45 million defensive gun uses per year in the United States. …The National Survey of Private Ownership of Firearms (NSPOF) was performed in 1994. It…found approximately 1.5 million defensive gun uses. …The high-end figures on defensive gun uses may well suffer from exaggeration or outright lies. …Since the survey data has severe limitations with respect to defensive gun uses, collecting accounts of self-defense as they are reported in news outlets may be a better method of assessing the frequency and nature of self-defense with firearms. The data set supporting this paper is derived from a collection of news stories published between October 2003 and November 2011. …after Colorado’s 2003 concealed carry law was enacted, Colorado State University decided to allow concealed carry,while the University of Colorado prohibited firearms. The former observed a rapid decline in reported crimes, while the latter, under the gun ban they claimed was for safety,observed a rapid increase in crime. Crime at the University of Colorado has risen 35 percent since 2004, while crime at Colorado State University has dropped 60 percent in the same time frame. …Many people support gun control regulations because they are convinced that the average citizen is either incapable of using a gun in self-defense or will use the gun in a fit of anger over some petty matter. Those assumptions are false. The evidence on this point has grown so strong that even President Obama has had to chide gun safety advocates to accept the proposition that“almost all gun owners in America are highly responsible.”And, as the scores of incidents described in this study show, gun owners stop a lot of criminal mayhem—attempted murders, rapes, assaults, robberies—every year. …Policymakers interested in harm reduction should thus refrain from treating ordinary gun owners as hoodlums or loose cannons and adopt policies that respect the ownership and carrying of arms by responsible individuals.

By the way, the last sentence is inadequate. Regardless of what policy makers decide, responsible and prudent people should own guns, even if it means breaking the law. Self defense is a fundamental right, whether for the purpose of thwarting crime, fighting oppression, or (as I explain in my appearance on NRA-TV) protecting against societal breakdown.

If you’re a fan of the Second Amendment, let’s close with some great links. Here are some anti-gun control posters that have been very popular (here, hereherehere, and here). Here are some amusing images of t-shirts and bumper stickers on gun control (herehere, and here). And here are three different videos on gun control (herehere, and here). Feel free to share all of these widely.

About these ads

3 Responses to Cato Study Shows Private Gun Ownership Reduces Crime, Saves Lives – Daniel J. Mitchell – Townhall Finance

  1. Mon frair; Your statement “Regardless of what policy makers decide, responsible and prudent people should own guns, even if it means breaking the law.” Is a bit amiss.

    Unless our government totally abrogates the 2nd amendment, (say by signing off on the U.N. international firearm proposal) which in itself is breaking the law; gun ownership is legal. I’d feel much more comfortable for your sake, as well as others who agree with us, if you put “period” after “prudent people should own guns”and end the sentence there.

    Otherwise, Big Brother, especially in lieu of the NDAA, and the other billpending to allow POTUS to strip a person of their citizenship, would be all too willing to use your statement as an excuse to procecute you.

  2. thatmrgguy says:

    Reblogged this on That Mr. G Guy's Blog and commented:
    My sentiments exactly…no further documentation is necessary.

  3. Pingback: Conceal and carry laws fuel surge in female gun ownership – KansasCity.com | 2nd Amendment, Shooting & Firearms Blog

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 4,062 other followers

%d bloggers like this: